Samsung Electronics Co , v Apple Inc , (2016) Supreme Court Oral Arguements



Samsung Electronics Co , v Apple Inc (2016) Supreme Court Oral Arguement/s, ————————————————————————————The patent doesn’t apply to the internals of the phone, so Apple doesn’t deserve profits on all of Samsung’s phone.” … Suggestions were raised to send the case to lower courts, while the Supreme Court creates new rules on how damages for infringing design patents are awarded and judged. Dec 6, 2016- Digital…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *